|
| |
I consider the results of the statistic study, included in MeMint, with the longitudinal data of the Young Adulthood Study, 1939-1967 to be conclusive about the genetic influence on intelligence (r2 till 0,99), the significance of the less powerful gene, important functionalities of the sexual diversification and about the existence of a teleological evolution. |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||
|
|
|
Translate Last update: September 2002 |
GENERAL THEORY OF THE CONDITIONAL EVOLUTION OF LIFE ![]() |
||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
| ||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
This is a translation of a reduce version of the GTCEL e-book. (The full version is in Spanish) |
|
NOTE: The model of the inheritance of intelligence has been validated using the longitudinal data set of the Young Adulthood Study, 1939-1967.
|
|
3) Conclusions. This theory represents, at least, an element of reflection on the long road of scientific knowledge. Regardless of the philosophical suggestions, this new theory presents revolutionary aspects within a scientific approach. We can mention the explication of the sexual diversification functionality, the greater precision in the definition of the dominant and recessive genes and other implications like the possible non existence of the lost chain of the human evolution. The evolutionary jumps normally will produce new species as a result of combining 2 or 3 different genetic sources. To summarise, the following conclusions can be inferred:
|
|